WHAT A BITCH MAINSTREAM MEDIA CAN BE
March 31st 2007 02:32
WHO’S SNEERING NOW: HOW MAINSTREAM CAN STITCH UP A DISSIDENT VOICE WITH ONE SNEAKY WORD
It’s interesting how one sneering word in the mainstream media can reduce a rational, cogent interesting article to irrelevance and even stupidity in the reader’s mind, bearing in mind of course that the reader has been shanghaied by the prejudice of the anonymous mainstream media hack who chose to use this word to describe the article in question.
According to the Weekend Australian (March 31- April 1, 2007) “The term Kangaroo court took on a new meaning with American readers as US newspapers gave David Hicks’ guilty plea wide coverage.”
It referred to an article written originally by US broadcaster Amy Goodman which originally appeared on the Information Clearing House blog and was apparently reprinted in the Seattle Post-Intelligence.
The article had already been discussed straightforwardly in the MediaBlab (Mar 30) news column published by Melbourne-based News Bites and Dow Jones’ Factiva.
This is how MediaBlab straightforwardly introduced the item:
“Amy Goodman is the host of US-based Democracy Now!, a daily TV/radio news hour airing on 500 stations in North America, and this week in the Information Clearing House she wrote an article titled, “American Kangaroo Court Claims Its First Victim.” It was of course about David Hicks.”
But this is how the Weekend Australian introduced the item:
“‘It is appropriate that person from Australia, home of the kangaroo, should be the first one dragged before the kangaroo court at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay,’ Amy Goodman sneered in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.”
Note the use of the word ‘sneered.’ This is not a word that appeared in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. It’s a word that comes straight from the keyboard of The Australian’s unnamed hack and of course it imparts the inference that not only is Goodman’s article is simply crap, but also universally understood to be so.
Below is the original piece as it appeared on the Information Clearing House Blog – what do you think. Who is guilty of sneering: Amy Goodman or The Australian?
American Kangaroo Court Claims Its First Victim
By Amy Goodman
03/28/07 "ICH " -- -- It is appropriate that a person from Australia, home of the kangaroo, should be the first one dragged before the kangaroo court at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay. David Hicks, imprisoned there for more than five years, pleaded guilty Monday to providing material support for terrorism.
The case of Hicks offers us a glimpse into the Kafkaesque netherworld of detentions, kidnappings, torture and show trials that is now, internationally, the shameful signature of the Bush administration. Hicks’ passage through this sham process affords us all an opportunity to demand the closure of Guantanamo and an end to these heinous policies. Conditions may soon exist to shutter the prison, with George Bush’s lame-duck status, the Democratic takeover of Congress, the possible departure of Guantanamo’s arch-defender and architect, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and, if recent reports are true, a desire to close the prison on the part of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. These bogus military commission trials amplify global contempt for the Guantanamo prison.
The Pentagon claims that Hicks was in Afghanistan fighting against the United States, then was apprehended by the Northern Alliance in late 2001 while fleeing to Pakistan. After transfer to U.S. military control, he was moved around various detention facilities and, he says, brutally beaten and sodomized. By January 2002 he was in Guantanamo. He was subjected to repeated interrogations. He witnessed other prisoners being beaten and terrorized with dogs. He was at times kept in total darkness, at times in continual bright light (he has grown his hair to chest length so he can cover his eyes to allow him to sleep). He had no access to a lawyer for more than a year or knowledge of the charges against him. Others, those lucky enough to have lawyers or to have actually gotten out, tell similar tales of continual cold, of desecration of the Quran and of sexual humiliation designed specifically to torture Muslim men.
During his five years of detention, people fought for Hicks. His father, Terry Hicks, traveled to the U.S. He donned an orange jumpsuit, like the one his son was forced to wear, and stood in a 6-foot-by-8-foot cage on Broadway in New York while fielding questions from the press.
Even the U.S. Supreme Court, the body that appointed Bush president in 2000, agreed that the prisoners must have some access to habeas corpus, the right to challenge one’s imprisonment. This central tenet of Western law, established in the Magna Carta in 1215, has been thrown out the window, along with the Geneva Conventions, by Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Gonzales and others.
Guantanamo has sparked one of the United States’ major growth industries: protesting against Guantanamo. From campuses to churches, the anger has driven regular citizens to action. Cindy Sheehan and members of the Catholic Worker Movement went to Cuba and marched overland to Guantanamo to challenge the illegitimate prison and its jailers in person.
Even in Hicks’ brief moment in the controversial “trial,” the government did what it could to strip him of the few rights it claims he has. The presiding military judge, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann, dismissed his civilian lawyer, Joshua Dratel, and a Navy reservist attorney, Rebecca Snyder, who was assisting Hicks’ government-appointed attorney. Hicks was stunned, and at first refused to plead. Hours later, after the trial was reconvened, he pleaded guilty to his one remaining charge. Having no hope for a fair trial, he reportedly believed that pleading guilty would allow him to serve his sentence in Australia—his only hope of escaping Guantanamo.
There are still more than 380 prisoners at Guantanamo. Almost none have been charged. Those ultimately charged with murder could be sentenced to death by the military commission. The decider of the death penalty after appeals are exhausted is none other than George Bush, who as governor of Texas oversaw the most active death chamber in the United States. Back then his lawyer was Alberto Gonzales.
The U.S. attorney scandal is threatening to take down Gonzales. But it is his condoning of torture from Guantanamo to Abu Ghraib that should seal his fate.
The grim Guantanamo experiment is reaching its climax. The house of cards that has been erected to support this immoral, criminal enterprise is poised to collapse. Call, shout, sit down, march, donate, write, protest … demand that Guantanamo be closed.
It’s interesting how one sneering word in the mainstream media can reduce a rational, cogent interesting article to irrelevance and even stupidity in the reader’s mind, bearing in mind of course that the reader has been shanghaied by the prejudice of the anonymous mainstream media hack who chose to use this word to describe the article in question.
According to the Weekend Australian (March 31- April 1, 2007) “The term Kangaroo court took on a new meaning with American readers as US newspapers gave David Hicks’ guilty plea wide coverage.”
The article had already been discussed straightforwardly in the MediaBlab (Mar 30) news column published by Melbourne-based News Bites and Dow Jones’ Factiva.
This is how MediaBlab straightforwardly introduced the item:
“Amy Goodman is the host of US-based Democracy Now!, a daily TV/radio news hour airing on 500 stations in North America, and this week in the Information Clearing House she wrote an article titled, “American Kangaroo Court Claims Its First Victim.” It was of course about David Hicks.”
But this is how the Weekend Australian introduced the item:
“‘It is appropriate that person from Australia, home of the kangaroo, should be the first one dragged before the kangaroo court at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay,’ Amy Goodman sneered in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.”
Note the use of the word ‘sneered.’ This is not a word that appeared in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. It’s a word that comes straight from the keyboard of The Australian’s unnamed hack and of course it imparts the inference that not only is Goodman’s article is simply crap, but also universally understood to be so.
American Kangaroo Court Claims Its First Victim
By Amy Goodman
03/28/07 "ICH " -- -- It is appropriate that a person from Australia, home of the kangaroo, should be the first one dragged before the kangaroo court at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay. David Hicks, imprisoned there for more than five years, pleaded guilty Monday to providing material support for terrorism.
The case of Hicks offers us a glimpse into the Kafkaesque netherworld of detentions, kidnappings, torture and show trials that is now, internationally, the shameful signature of the Bush administration. Hicks’ passage through this sham process affords us all an opportunity to demand the closure of Guantanamo and an end to these heinous policies. Conditions may soon exist to shutter the prison, with George Bush’s lame-duck status, the Democratic takeover of Congress, the possible departure of Guantanamo’s arch-defender and architect, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and, if recent reports are true, a desire to close the prison on the part of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. These bogus military commission trials amplify global contempt for the Guantanamo prison.
The Pentagon claims that Hicks was in Afghanistan fighting against the United States, then was apprehended by the Northern Alliance in late 2001 while fleeing to Pakistan. After transfer to U.S. military control, he was moved around various detention facilities and, he says, brutally beaten and sodomized. By January 2002 he was in Guantanamo. He was subjected to repeated interrogations. He witnessed other prisoners being beaten and terrorized with dogs. He was at times kept in total darkness, at times in continual bright light (he has grown his hair to chest length so he can cover his eyes to allow him to sleep). He had no access to a lawyer for more than a year or knowledge of the charges against him. Others, those lucky enough to have lawyers or to have actually gotten out, tell similar tales of continual cold, of desecration of the Quran and of sexual humiliation designed specifically to torture Muslim men.
During his five years of detention, people fought for Hicks. His father, Terry Hicks, traveled to the U.S. He donned an orange jumpsuit, like the one his son was forced to wear, and stood in a 6-foot-by-8-foot cage on Broadway in New York while fielding questions from the press.
Even the U.S. Supreme Court, the body that appointed Bush president in 2000, agreed that the prisoners must have some access to habeas corpus, the right to challenge one’s imprisonment. This central tenet of Western law, established in the Magna Carta in 1215, has been thrown out the window, along with the Geneva Conventions, by Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Gonzales and others.
Guantanamo has sparked one of the United States’ major growth industries: protesting against Guantanamo. From campuses to churches, the anger has driven regular citizens to action. Cindy Sheehan and members of the Catholic Worker Movement went to Cuba and marched overland to Guantanamo to challenge the illegitimate prison and its jailers in person.
Even in Hicks’ brief moment in the controversial “trial,” the government did what it could to strip him of the few rights it claims he has. The presiding military judge, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann, dismissed his civilian lawyer, Joshua Dratel, and a Navy reservist attorney, Rebecca Snyder, who was assisting Hicks’ government-appointed attorney. Hicks was stunned, and at first refused to plead. Hours later, after the trial was reconvened, he pleaded guilty to his one remaining charge. Having no hope for a fair trial, he reportedly believed that pleading guilty would allow him to serve his sentence in Australia—his only hope of escaping Guantanamo.
There are still more than 380 prisoners at Guantanamo. Almost none have been charged. Those ultimately charged with murder could be sentenced to death by the military commission. The decider of the death penalty after appeals are exhausted is none other than George Bush, who as governor of Texas oversaw the most active death chamber in the United States. Back then his lawyer was Alberto Gonzales.
The U.S. attorney scandal is threatening to take down Gonzales. But it is his condoning of torture from Guantanamo to Abu Ghraib that should seal his fate.
The grim Guantanamo experiment is reaching its climax. The house of cards that has been erected to support this immoral, criminal enterprise is poised to collapse. Call, shout, sit down, march, donate, write, protest … demand that Guantanamo be closed.
| 50 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog
